I saw your post on the BMWSportTouring forum, that Cassie starred in the Animal Witness show, “Follow me Layla”. It was a good performance, and an interesting show, but unfortunately it wasn’t faithful to the facts of the David Westerfield-Danielle van Dam case. For a start, Layla could bark, she just didn’t do so very often. And the prosecution theory that her hairs got into Westerfield’s environment on a kidnapped Danielle’s pajamas has two flaws. One is that they could just as easily have got there on her daytime clothes when she sold cookies to him about three days before; the other is that the police didn’t report finding any Danielle pajama fibers in his environment. The case is discussed in the book “Rush to Judgement” http://tinyurl.com/6bzzyf4.
I saw your post on the BMWSportTouring forum, that Cassie starred in the Animal Witness show, “Follow me Layla”. It was a good performance, and an interesting show, but unfortunately it wasn’t faithful to the facts of the David Westerfield-Danielle van Dam case. For a start, Layla could bark, she just didn’t do so very often. And the prosecution theory that her hairs got into Westerfield’s environment on a kidnapped Danielle’s pajamas has two flaws. One is that they could just as easily have got there on her daytime clothes when she sold cookies to him about three days before; the other is that the police didn’t report finding any Danielle pajama fibers in his environment. The case is discussed in the book “Rush to Judgement” http://tinyurl.com/6bzzyf4.
ReplyDelete